Uncategorized

A conversation in a Marina Bay tower last month, with a managing director at one of the larger Singapore family offices, ran for ninety minutes before either of us said the word that had been sitting in the room the whole time. He had been walking me through their private markets allocation for the year, the careful reweighting away from venture, the small overweight to private credit, the trimming of their megafund commitments. At one point he stopped and said, almost to himself, that the conversations he was having with general partners had a different quality this year. Not panicked. Not even particularly defensive. Something closer to the tone of someone explaining why a building project will take longer than planned. The word neither of us said was reset. The industry has been using it for two years now, and it has become the polite shorthand for what is actually happening. A reset implies a return to a baseline. What I have come to think instead is that there is no baseline to return to. The thing that private equity has been for the last fifteen years is being silently restructured into something else, and the asset class people will own in 2031 will not be the asset class they thought they were buying in 2021. This is a report about what that something else is, and where the original private equity thesis still survives. It covers what the data actually shows across the four working segments of the asset class today. It also offers a forward picture for 2031 that is not consensus, because consensus on this market is currently wrong in a particular and consequential way. Most of what gets written about private equity in 2026 frames the moment as cyclical. Distributions are slow. Fundraising is hard. Exits will return when rates settle and the IPO window reopens. The mega-funds will continue compounding. The mid-market will struggle for a few more years. Then the asset class will resume its long arc. The texture of the data does not support that reading. What the data suggests instead is that 2010 to 2021 was the anomaly. The era of cheap money, expanding multiples, and patient limited partners was the period that flattered every vintage and made the asset class look like an operating discipline when it was largely a financial-engineering one. The current moment is the first honest measurement in fifteen years. And the response of the largest private equity firms is not to fix the underlying model. It is to quietly transform themselves into something that has different economics, different return expectations, and a different relationship with capital. Insurance. Asset management. Spread businesses on permanent capital. The carry-driven, alpha-generating, operating-improvement narrative that defined the asset class is being preserved only in the segments small enough to still mean it. That is the spine of this report. The numbers that follow are the texture. The Numbers That Define the Moment Bain’s 2026 Global Private Equity Report opens with a figure that has been hardening for four years and is now structural. Distributions to limited partners have held below 15 percent of net asset value for four consecutive years, an industry record by a wide margin. Buyout funds collectively sit on USD 3.8 trillion in unrealised value, and dry powder still sits near USD 1.3 trillion, much of it raised in the 2022 to 2023 vintages and now ageing. McKinsey’s 2026 Global Private Markets Report puts a sharper number on the exit problem. The backlog of buyout-backed companies that have been on the books for more than four years now totals around 16,000 globally. That is fifty-two percent of total buyout-backed inventory. The highest concentration of overdue exits ever recorded. The hold-period data tells the same story from a different angle. According to S&P Global’s 2025 buyout data, the average buyout hold reached 6.4 years in 2025, against a pre-pandemic average of 5.2 years. Distributions as a percentage of fund AUM declined to roughly six percent in the six months ending June 2025, against a ten-year average of fourteen percent. Five-year DPI for buyout funds is at its lowest recorded level. None of these are cyclical numbers. They are the marks left by an exit market that has structurally narrowed and an asset class that has not yet adjusted. The return data is the part of this picture the industry has been most reluctant to surface. Buyout fund IRRs reached a post-2002 trough between 2022 and 2025, averaging 5.7 percent on a pooled basis. Over the same period, the S&P 500 returned 11.6 percent annualised. In 2025, top-quartile global buyout returns averaged roughly eight percent, against eighteen percent for the S&P 500 and twenty-two percent for MSCI World. The 2015 to 2017 vintages, which represent the last fully measured cohort, are generating roughly two percent IRRs. Newer vintages show fifteen percent on paper, but those marks are largely unrealised and structurally vulnerable to the same exit drought that produced the older numbers. A long-only public equity index has outperformed the average buyout fund net of fees over the most recent measurable cycle, by a wide margin. This is not a partisan reading. It is what the underlying numbers say, and it is what most institutional limited partners have already quietly priced into their next round of allocations. McKinsey’s January 2026 survey of 300 LPs reports that around seventy percent plan to maintain or increase their private equity allocations in 2026. That allocation discipline is real, but it should not be confused with conviction in returns. It is conviction in the signalling cost of being out of the asset class entirely. A different thing. The fundraising data underneath that allocation discipline is uneven in ways that matter. Closed-end PE fundraising fell seventeen percent year-on-year in 2025 to roughly USD 616 billion. Within that figure, North America rose eight percent. Europe fell forty-one percent. Asia-Pacific fell forty-nine percent to USD 49 billion. The ten largest fund closes captured forty-six percent of all

There is a category of business in Southeast Asia that generates real cash flow, carries no distress, and cannot access a dollar of institutional capital. Private credit is built for exactly that gap.

Across Southeast Asia, a generation of business owners built profitable companies with no plan for what happens next. The gap that creates is hiding in plain sight — and it is large.

When the bank offers acquisition financing at prime plus three, there is a cheaper and structurally smarter option sitting across the negotiating table from you.

Most people encounter search funds and assume it is a startup play dressed in acquisition language. It is not. The model is older, quieter, and produces returns that most venture investors would find surprising.